|
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Evil Parasite
|
Post subject: Rush, Conquest or squad deathmatch? Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 1:08 pm |
|
Joined: 16 May 2005 Posts: 2393 Location: Kings Lynn
Xbox Live Gamertag:
Playstation ID: EvilParasite
Skype Username: evilparasite
Shoe Size: 10
motto: omg i miss Socom 2
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Skunkontoast
|
Post subject: Re: Rush, Conquest or squad deathmatch? Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 10:56 pm |
|
Joined: 31 Jan 2007 Posts: 472 Location: Maidstone Kent
Xbox Live Gamertag:
Playstation ID: hahahahahahaha not likely
Shoe Size: 11
motto: Eat the Rich
|
|
I do prefer rush to conquest. Mainly as I'm pretty poor at conquest and at least with rush I've got a vague idea of where the badguys are coming from. My main problem with conquest is that apart from being able to gain easier access to some of the vehicles there seems to be no real advantage to capturing the bases. You can survive pretty well with the vehicles in your base spawn. If they changed the system so you gained points by owning the bases much like n mw2 rather than it coming down to pretty much a team deathmatch. Rush has been improved alot since bfbc1 and I feel it to be alot more balanced. I havnt actually played squad rush yet so can't comment on that.
_________________ Everyone should read " Hellboy by Mike Mignola"
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Squishy Muffin
|
Post subject: Re: Rush, Conquest or squad deathmatch? Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 11:05 pm |
|
Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 869 Location: Newhaven, East Sussex
Xbox Live Gamertag:
Shoe Size: 8
motto: Better to be pissed off than pissed on
|
|
I like to switch between both. If I'm doing bad in rush I switch to conquest, vice versa.
Rush is ok, but it feels like they went a bit over the top in making the maps real narrow and filling them with loads of bottle necks.
Conquest is ok too but the maps in general are a bit small and don't consist of more than 4 flags. Conquest will never feel the same as it did in BFMC2 (for me anyway). Probably due to destruction elements. Also, I was told that having a majority of flags doesn't lower the ticket count for a kill any quicker than having it even. Only if you have ALL flags. Which to me is so stupid, it was fine in BFBC1 (though the games in that seemed to end a little too quickly)
The other modes I dont like and feel like a last minute add on to make up for the number of modes. To compete with MW2...
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ZeroFoxShot
|
Post subject: Re: Rush, Conquest or squad deathmatch? Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 11:36 pm |
|
Joined: 24 Feb 2008 Posts: 730 Location: Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire
Xbox Live Gamertag:
ZeroFoxShot  : 65720
Zone:Recreation
Shoe Size: 7
motto: I'll do it on the night
|
|
2Fort CTF.
_________________
 WINNER
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Geezaa
|
Post subject: Re: Rush, Conquest or squad deathmatch? Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:13 pm |
|
 |
| ARSE Member |
 |
Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 142
|
|
not a big fan of squad deathmatch. i also find conquest a bit boring , coz if your gettin base killed , the tickets dont go down if you own nothing. And the chopper whores on atacama desert do my head in. i like rush a little better coz it can last a little while .
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
KAMAKAZEE
|
Post subject: Re: Rush, Conquest or squad deathmatch? Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:27 pm |
|
Joined: 18 Mar 2006 Posts: 3734 Location: Leeds
Xbox Live Gamertag:
Shoe Size: 11
|
|
Same as Squishy Really flick between them both but also Evil
I like conquest as that what I have always played on BFMC and BFBC so thats always my fraviote but I do like rush aswell just depends on if I getting owned or not
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Git
|
Post subject: Re: Rush, Conquest or squad deathmatch? Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 4:04 pm |
|
Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 4714 Location: Bognor Regis
Xbox Live Gamertag:
Skype Username: keith.roskilly
Shoe Size: 10
|
As long as I'm in a tank with Geezaa driving I don't care 
_________________
 Temp sig but still like it!
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Geezaa
|
Post subject: Re: Rush, Conquest or squad deathmatch? Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 1:35 am |
|
 |
| ARSE Member |
 |
Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 142
|
|
Well being a tank / engineer whore i dont mind either rush or conquest , as long as there is vehicles. Rush is fun cos working as a squad or two can be very rewarding . conquest on the other hand is enjoyable when you can hold a flag. Nothing better off the thrill of defending a flag with a coupla land mine kills and and a few with the pp2000 . Got over 1500 landmine kills now. Yeah baby
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Skunkontoast
|
Post subject: Re: Rush, Conquest or squad deathmatch? Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 11:28 am |
|
Joined: 31 Jan 2007 Posts: 472 Location: Maidstone Kent
Xbox Live Gamertag:
Playstation ID: hahahahahahaha not likely
Shoe Size: 11
motto: Eat the Rich
|
|
I need to play some more of this it's been a little while we should try and get a regular night at this at least cause everytime I chuck on my xbox there's no one playing this.
_________________ Everyone should read " Hellboy by Mike Mignola"
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Geezaa
|
Post subject: Re: Rush, Conquest or squad deathmatch? Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 3:29 pm |
|
 |
| ARSE Member |
 |
Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 142
|
|
Thurs are normally pretty good . theres normally bout 4 or 5 of us . will make sure im on. See if we can get a full side going. pucka
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|